Re: 7.3 schedule

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: "Ashley Cambrell" <ash(at)freaky-namuh(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.3 schedule
Date: 2002-04-11 15:54:34
Message-ID: 20020411115434.201ff92f.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:25:24 +1000
"Ashley Cambrell" <ash(at)freaky-namuh(dot)com> wrote:
> What are the chances that the BE/FE will be altered to take advantage of
> prepare / execute? Or is it something that will "never happen"?

Is there a need for this? The current patch I'm working on just
does everything using SQL statements, which I don't think is
too bad (the typical client programmer won't actually need to
see them, their interface should wrap the PREPARE/EXECUTE stuff
for them).

On the other hand, there are already a few reasons to make some
changes to the FE/BE protocol (NOTIFY messages, transaction state,
and now possibly PREPARE/EXECUTE -- anything else?). IMHO, each of
these isn't worth changing the protocol by itself, but perhaps if
we can get all 3 in one swell foop it might be a good idea...

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-11 15:57:56 Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-04-11 15:51:46 Re: 7.3 schedule