Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate
Date: 2002-04-11 04:50:15
Message-ID: 200204110450.g3B4oFq02968@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > It seems to me that whatever we do
> > will require some kind of client breakage.
>
> Physical/logical attnum approach was mainly to not break
> clients. I implemented it on trial but the implementation
> was hard to maintain unfortunately. It's pretty difficult
> to decide whether the number is physical or logical in
> many cases.

How many cases do we have that use logical numering? Hiroshi, I know
you are the expert on this. I know 'SELECT *' uses it, but are their
other places that need to know about the logical ordering of the
columns?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-11 04:51:58 7.3 schedule
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-04-11 04:45:22 Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate