Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate
Date: 2002-04-06 10:41:44
Message-ID: 20020406184034.G99366-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> A more serious objection is that this will break client applications
> that know about the pg_aggregate table. However, 7.3 is already going
> to force a lot of reprogramming of clients that inspect system tables,
> because of the addition of namespaces. Restructuring pg_aggregate
> doesn't seem like it makes life all that much worse.

How about putting a note in the 7.3 release that tells them not to rely on
sequential attnums in tn pg_attribute anymore. That should make it easier
to implement column dropping in the future?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-06 10:43:27 Re: Suggestion for optimization
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-04-06 09:14:53 Re: timeout implementation issues