From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman(at)dynamicdiagrams(dot)com>, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: timeout implementation issues |
Date: | 2002-04-06 01:32:47 |
Message-ID: | 200204060132.g361WlN05079@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Or, as I suggested above, extend the SELECT (and other querys?) syntax
> seems reasonable. More so than the non-standard 'use this index, really'
> types of extensions that other RDBMSs provide, that we've rightly avoided.
I think we need timeout for all statement.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-06 01:33:37 | Re: timeout implementation issues |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-04-06 00:43:08 | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |