Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Marc G. Fournier writes:
> >> Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks
> >> clean, sizes all look right ...
>
> > ... but the contained documentation is for 7.3.
>
> On the subject of contained documentation, I notice
>
> *** postgresql-7.2.1/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml Mon Mar 18 18:04:11 2002
> --- REL7_2/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml Thu May 10 21:46:33 2001
> ***************
> *** 3,7 ****
> documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them.
> -->
>
> ! <!entity version "7.2.1">
> ! <!entity majorversion "7.2.1">
> --- 3,7 ----
> documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them.
> -->
>
> ! <!entity version "7.2">
> ! <!entity majorversion "7.2">
>
> Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand
> the latter seems correct ...

I wasn't sure what to do here. I figured if the docs were regenerated,
it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026