Re: rule problem

tsmets(at)brutele(dot)be wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> I thought I could do smthg like :
> do instead
> begin work
> Action_1;
> Action_2;
> Action_3;
> commit work
>
> Could some one suggest a better solution ?
> I have never seen what happens if I set multiple rules.
> Are they applied in the order they were created ?

You cannot and don't need to do BEGIN and COMMIT as rule
actions. Write it as

do instead
(
Action_1;
Action_2;
Action_3;
);

and the actions will be perfomed in that order, all in one
and the same transaction.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com