Re: Anyone working on non-cygwin Win32 Port?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Clark C (dot) Evans" <cce(at)clarkevans(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone working on non-cygwin Win32 Port?
Date: 2002-03-24 06:16:00
Message-ID: 200203240616.g2O6G0b17527@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Clark C . Evans wrote:
> ?

People have talked about non-cygwin Win32 ports, but the work would
basically require recreating cygwin, and many people don't feel it is
worth it. If there is a particular part of cygwin that doesn't emulate
well, and it can't be fixed in cygwin, we would be interested in perhaps
making that part native to Win32.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark kirkwood 2002-03-24 12:23:07 Re: SQL Server performing much better?!?!
Previous Message Clark C . Evans 2002-03-24 00:01:15 Anyone working on non-cygwin Win32 Port?