Re: Small question

From: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Joep deVocht <joep(at)masktools(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small question
Date: 2002-03-22 19:30:00
Message-ID: 200203221930.g2MJU0316307@saturn.janwieck.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> >> It seems like it might be possible for libpq (or other clients) to keep
> >> track of the transaction state by paying attention to BEGIN, COMMIT,
> >> ABORT command-completion tags and ERROR messages, but I haven't worked
> >> through the details.
>
> > PQexec(c, "BEGIN; SELECT now()");
>
> > Will there even be a BEGIN command tag sent?
>
> Yes. PQexec doesn't tell you about it, but one comes through. (This
> is certainly true in current sources, and I believe has always been true.)
>
> It'd be nastier if we allowed functions to change the transaction-block
> state, but we don't...

Well, then we don't need a protocol change. Libpq and other
interface libraries could keep track of it without.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-22 19:52:29 Re: Small question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-22 19:26:34 Re: Small question