Re: ecpg weird behavior

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Hal Davison <hal(at)faams(dot)net>
Cc: Nicolas Bazin <nbazin(at)ingenico(dot)com(dot)au>, Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ecpg weird behavior
Date: 2002-03-20 20:05:14
Message-ID: 20020320200514.GB14143@feivel.fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 07:39:27PM -0500, Hal Davison wrote:
> Why is an ARRAY type not supported by SQL as a columnar definition as an
> extension to each data element?

Sorry, I didn't exactly understand what you mean. Where do you want to
use an array?

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

  • ARRAY at 2002-03-21 15:34:46 from Hal Davison

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2002-03-20 20:17:34 Re: ecpg weird behavior
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2002-03-20 20:03:51 Re: ecpg weird behavior