Re: Auomatic numbering, replacing nulls and IF

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Pestilence <me(at)work(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Auomatic numbering, replacing nulls and IF
Date: 2002-03-20 16:37:23
Message-ID: 20020320083324.C45997-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Pestilence wrote:

> 2) The ISNULL function in both Oracle and MS-SQL takes 2 numbers and returns
> the second if the first is null, otherwise it returns the first. ISNULL in
> Postgres seems to be something quite different. Before I go writing my own
> function to do it, is there one already?
>

Coalesce

> 3) How do I do 'IF this_sql THEN that_sql'? I keep getting:
> parse error at or near "IF"

In what context?
If you mean like
IF (select * from foo) then delete from foo
kind of context, that kind of thing is availble
via pl functions but not AFAIK via direct sql.

If you mean in a select list:
select (if a is 2 then 3 else 1)
you can use CASE.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-20 16:41:43 Re: R: Bad timestamp external representation '2001-05-11
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2002-03-20 16:37:20 Re: Distributed databases and replication in postgresql 7.3