Re: Again, sorry, caching, (Tom What do you think: function

From: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers(at)dynworks(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching, (Tom What do you think: function
Date: 2002-03-19 18:13:56
Message-ID: 200203191813.g2JIDui09169@saturn.janwieck.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw wrote:
> [...]
>
> IMHO modifying the function manager to allow the return of a full row, and a
> "set of" full rows, answers a LOT of issues I have seen over the years with
> PostgreSQL extensibility.

Sure. Actually I think you'll have an easy project with this
one, because all the work has been done by Tom already.

The function manager isn't the problem any more. It is that
you cannot have such a "set of" function in the rangetable.
So you have no mechanism to USE the result.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-03-19 18:51:39 Re: Again, sorry, caching, (Tom What do you think: function
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2002-03-19 18:12:52 Re: Again, sorry, caching.