| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_hba.conf and secondary password file |
| Date: | 2002-03-15 23:22:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200203152322.g2FNMZa08136@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Right now, we support a secondary password file reference in
> > pg_hba.conf.
> > Is it worth keeping this password capability in 7.3?
>
> I'd not cry if it went away. We could get rid of pg_passwd, which
> is an ugly mess...
Yes, that was my thinking too. Seems like a good time for housecleaning
pg_hba.conf.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-15 23:23:47 | Re: question on index access |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-03-15 23:20:17 | Re: timestamp_part() bug? |