pg_hba.conf and secondary password file

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: pg_hba.conf and secondary password file
Date: 2002-03-15 22:46:09
Message-ID: 200203152246.g2FMk9M04374@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Right now, we support a secondary password file reference in
pg_hba.conf.

If the file contains only usernames, we assume that it is the list of
valid usernames for the connection. If it contains usernames and
passwords, like /etc/passwd, we assume these are the passwords to be
used for the connection. Such connections must pass the unencrypted
passwords over the wire so they can be matched against the file;
'password' encryption in pg_hba.conf.

Is it worth keeping this password capability in 7.3? It requires
'password' in pg_hba.conf, which is not secure, and I am not sure how
many OS's still use crypt in /etc/passwd anyway. Removing the feature
would clear up pg_hba.conf options a little.

The ability to specify usernames in pg_hba.conf or in a secondary file
is being added to pg_hba.conf anyway, so it is really only the password
part that we have to decide to keep or remove.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-03-15 22:55:24 question on index access
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2002-03-15 22:41:32 Re: User Level Lock question