From: | wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | cbroussard(at)liquiddatainc(dot)com (Chris) |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Nested Transactions |
Date: | 2002-03-13 18:05:04 |
Message-ID: | 200203131805.NAA14241@interlock2.lexmark.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I don't believe postgresql supports nested transactions yet.
Wes Sheldahl
cbroussard%liquiddatainc(dot)com(at)interlock(dot)lexmark(dot)com (Chris) on 03/08/2002
02:12:33 AM
To: pgsql-general%postgresql(dot)org(at)interlock(dot)lexmark(dot)com
cc: (bcc: Wesley Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: [GENERAL] Nested Transactions
i'm trying to accomplish the following task:
begin transaction;
begin work;
create table xyz(
id int
);
commit work;
select * from xyz;
rollback transaction;
select * from xyz; // should say database object doesn't exist
however i'm failing to be able to do this?? is there a specific reason?
I know in MSSQL you can say:
begin transaction
begin transaction test
create table xyz(
id [int]
);
select * from xyz
commit transaction test
rollback transaction
select * from xyz // database object doesn't exist
Is there an equivalent?
TIA
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeffrey W. Baker | 2002-03-13 18:15:38 | Re: more about pg_toast growth |
Previous Message | Bob T | 2002-03-13 18:04:33 | dxf file format |