Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS

From: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
Date: 2002-03-11 20:55:22
Message-ID: 200203112055.g2BKtM428341@saturn.janwieck.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Greg Copeland wrote:
>
> Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > I'm looking through the index code and just happened to notice that
> > INDEX_MAX_KEYS is currently set to 16. It there a reason for this value
> > to be at 16 or was it arbitrarily specified?
>
> Arbitrary, and there is discussion about increasing it.

Wasn't it that this number had to be <= the maximum number of
function args?

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Pritchard 2002-03-11 20:56:23 Re: Do FROM items of different schemas conflict?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-11 20:52:51 Re: Domain Support -- another round