Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output
Date: 2002-03-11 05:25:54
Message-ID: 200203110525.g2B5Ps927874@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> > Yes, this was my initial proposal but Tom didn't like it. Seemed very
> > clear to me. Tom wants EXPLAIN VERBOSE VERBOSE.
>
> Eh. Don't like that myself. How about adding V's to verbose? So
>
> EXPLAIN VERBOSE
> EXPLAIN VVERBOSE
> EXPLAIN VVVERBOSE
>
> Then for maximum verbosity, duplicate every letter:
>
> EXPLAIN VVEERRBBOOSSEE
>
>
> Uh, just kidding. I'm not partial to the duplicated keyword. Really.

You had me going there for a while. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-11 05:30:29 Re: Autoconf upgrade
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-11 05:25:13 Re: Autoconf upgrade