| From: | Masaru Sugawara <rk73(at)sea(dot)plala(dot)or(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Adding qualification conditions to EXPLAIN output |
| Date: | 2002-03-10 05:43:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20020310144139.678F.RK73@sea.plala.or.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 09 Mar 2002 18:02:17 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I have been fooling around with adding decompiled display of plan
> qualification conditions to EXPLAIN output. With this, you can
> for example tell the difference between indexscanned and
> not-indexscanned clauses, without having to dig through EXPLAIN
> VERBOSE dumps. Here is an example motivated by Rob Hoopman's
> recent query on pgsql-general:
...
> Question for the group: does this seem valuable enough to put into the
> standard EXPLAIN output, or should it be a special option? I can
> imagine showing it only in EXPLAIN VERBOSE's summary display, or adding
> a GUC variable to enable it, or adding another option keyword to
> EXPLAIN, but I don't much want to do any of those things. On the other
> hand, maybe this stuff won't make any sense to non-experts anyway.
> Thoughts?
AFAIC, I'd think adding another keyword is better if the standard
EXPLAIN is extended.
e.g.
EXPLAIN keyword SELECT * FROM ...
EXPLAIN ANALYZE keyword SELECT * FROM ...
Regards,
Masaru Sugawara
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-03-10 06:01:37 | Re: Index USING in pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Lee Harr | 2002-03-10 00:33:13 | Re: bug in psql |