| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Index USING in pg_dump |
| Date: | 2002-03-08 16:07:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200203081607.g28G7vd16160@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > This is possible because btree is the default. TODO item is:
> > * Remove USING clause from pg_get_indexdef() if index is btree (Bruce)
>
> I do not think this is necessary or helpful. The only possible
> reason to change it would be if we thought btree might someday
> not be the default index type --- but no such change is on the
> horizon. And if one was, you've just embedded special knowledge
> about btree in yet one more place...
Yes, but it doesn't look like the way they created it. Very few use
USING in there queries. Why show it in pg_dump output?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-08 16:35:11 | Re: Index USING in pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2002-03-08 16:06:33 | Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-08 16:35:11 | Re: Index USING in pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-03-08 12:59:30 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |