Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: cnliou(at)eurosport(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question
Date: 2002-03-08 01:12:28
Message-ID: 200203080112.g281CSX25805@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> <cnliou(at)eurosport(dot)com> writes:
> > Because pl/pgsql accepts at most 16 parameters, I am
> > trying to feed pl/pgsql function with the whole
> > record as its parameter.
>
> Looks like a bug to me :-(. Unfortunately, there's no time to do
> anything about it for 7.2. In the meantime, the 16-parameter limit
> is by no means graven in stone; perhaps you could cope for awhile
> by recompiling with a larger FUNC_MAX_ARGS.

Tom, can you summarize the issue here?. Our 16-param limit is for both
old and new-style functions? Did we agree to increase this, perhaps to
24 or 32. Did we decide?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-08 01:17:50 Re: April 1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-08 01:03:07 Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online