From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | cnliou(at)eurosport(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question |
Date: | 2002-03-08 01:12:28 |
Message-ID: | 200203080112.g281CSX25805@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> <cnliou(at)eurosport(dot)com> writes:
> > Because pl/pgsql accepts at most 16 parameters, I am
> > trying to feed pl/pgsql function with the whole
> > record as its parameter.
>
> Looks like a bug to me :-(. Unfortunately, there's no time to do
> anything about it for 7.2. In the meantime, the 16-parameter limit
> is by no means graven in stone; perhaps you could cope for awhile
> by recompiling with a larger FUNC_MAX_ARGS.
Tom, can you summarize the issue here?. Our 16-param limit is for both
old and new-style functions? Did we agree to increase this, perhaps to
24 or 32. Did we decide?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-03-08 01:17:50 | Re: April 1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-08 01:03:07 | Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online |