Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users
Date: 2002-03-06 03:15:09
Message-ID: 200203060315.g263F9922012@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > Does anyone have any ideas? If not, would someone be willing to take
> > > the time to fix it?
> >
> > It has not been fixed. One TODO item is to either stop mentioning hash
> > at all or get it improved. We have been sitting on the fence for too
> > long.
>
> I'll be working on fixing this. I'm also going to try to add more
> features to the hash index implementation: for example, allow UNIQUE
> hash indexes, hash indexes over multiple keys, etc. My first improvement
> to the hash code, replacing the hash function with a better one, is on
> the unapplied patches list and should be in CVS soon. Bruce, can you add
> my name to the TODO list next to this item?

TODO updated. Done.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-03-06 03:16:50 Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users
Previous Message Nicolas Bazin 2002-03-06 03:14:02 Re: Vacuum daemon (pgvacuumd ?)