| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY |
| Date: | 2002-03-05 18:01:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200203051801.g25I1a928368@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Lee Kindness wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
> > [ COPY syntax ]
> > If we were working in a green field I'd vote for moving BINARY into the
> > WITH-options too, but we aren't. Again that seems too likely to break
> > things in the name of a small amount of added consistency.
>
> Hawabout 'COPY ...' retains the existing syntax but if used like 'COPY
> TABLE ...' sane syntax is used?
Interesting idea, but TABLE just seems to be a noise word to me. COPY
is one of those commands that it is hard to change because pg_dump
relies on it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-03-05 18:02:16 | Re: Undocumented feature costs a lot of performance in COPY |
| Previous Message | Arguile | 2002-03-05 17:57:50 | Intervening in Parser -> Planner Stage |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-03-05 18:02:16 | Re: Undocumented feature costs a lot of performance in COPY |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-03-05 17:56:24 | Re: enable debugging in jdbc |