Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life : NEWS!!!

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
Cc: Jean-Paul ARGUDO <jean-paul(dot)argudo(at)IDEALX(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life : NEWS!!!
Date: 2002-03-02 15:47:36
Message-ID: 20020302154737.10A8D1BBC@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On March 2, 2002 09:02 am, Doug McNaught wrote:
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> > Any chance you can try it with the MONEY type? It does use integers to
> > store the data. It isn't really designed for general numeric use but it
> > would be interesting to see how it fares.
>
> I think the MONEY type is deprecated...

I keep hearing that but I use it heavily and I hope it never goes away. The
NUMERIC type is nice but I still think that the MONEY type works well for
certain things. I bet it will be shown to be more efficient. Certainly
it has limitations but within those limitations it works well.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-03-02 17:23:30 Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-03-02 14:14:23 numeric/decimal docs bug?