| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring of command.c |
| Date: | 2002-02-27 03:15:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200202270315.g1R3FPv04041@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I know that "renamed" files in CVS will lose their history (for
> tracability we presumably wouldn't rename them in the repository), so I
> accept that it may not be a great idea to rename them, but it seems a
> little redundant to use commands/dbcommands.c rather than
> commands/database.c.
>
> As I'm new to this kind of change, I assume that I'd just submit a
> normal context diff for this and rely on it not getting tangled up with
> any other patches to these files? Or is this *too* radical a reshuffle?
> :-)
Post the patch and we will try to get it approved quickly for
application. That's about the only clean way I know to do it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-02-27 03:39:43 | Re: Refactoring of command.c |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-27 03:09:32 | Re: COPY FROM is not 8bit clean |