From: | Amit Kumar Khare <skamit2000(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, param_inder(at)yahoo(dot)com, kharebm(at)yahoo(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Implementation Proposal For Add Free Behind Capability For Large Sequential Scan |
Date: | 2002-02-26 17:30:32 |
Message-ID: | 20020226173032.31730.qmail@web10106.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--- Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 08:30, Amit Kumar Khare wrote:
>
> > Considering thesesuggestions as our baseline we
> have decided to
> implement Most Recently Used(MRU) cache replacement
> policy. Our task
> will be to identify a large sequentialscan and then
> advice the buffer
> manager to apply MRU for cache replacement.
Neil wrote:
> This could lead to poor buffer performance in the
> case of multiple
> backends simultaneously executing queries. How will
> you handle this?
Certainly it's cause of concern. I am looking for
literature regarding it. I kindly request you all to
inform me if any body finds some thing related to it.
Thanks and Regards
Amit Khare
>
>
> --
> Neil Padgett
> Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail:
> npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300,
> Toronto, ON M4P 2C9
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Helge Bahmann | 2002-02-26 17:31:49 | Re: WAL Performance Improvements |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-02-26 17:15:42 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? |