Re: [HACKERS] Nice Oracle tuning article

From: GB Clark <postgres(at)vsservices(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Nice Oracle tuning article
Date: 2002-02-25 18:02:17
Message-ID: 20020225120217.06a22d68.postgres@vsservices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:42:15 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> This is a nice article about tuning Oracle for Linux:
>
> http://www.linuxjournal.com//article.php?sid=5840
>
> It would be nice to have some of these numbers for PostgreSQL. Does
> no-access-time affect performance? What about the other parameters?
Bruce,

I know for a fact that under FreeBSD setting noatime in /etc/fstab helps both
PostgreSQL and Apache. Otherwise the system has to update whichever file has been
touched even though on 95% of the files we don't care. Maybe not quite as a big win
as Apache, but it does help PostgreSQL.

GB

--
GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
gclarkii(at)VSServices(dot)COM | General Geek
CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-25 18:02:56 Re: A minor bug and a complaint
Previous Message Matteo Beccati 2002-02-25 17:42:34 Timestamp output

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-25 18:30:10 Re: More time zones
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-25 17:24:20 Re: missing foreign key fails silently using COPY