| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: elog() proposal |
| Date: | 2002-02-23 00:20:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200202230020.g1N0KBQ09567@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Oh, now I get the point: you want to not pick up debug-level messages
> for translation at all. That makes sense. Okay, how about we take
> the names Bruce was proposing and make them function names:
>
> PGLog(msg, ...)
> PGError(msg, ...)
> PGCrash(msg, ...)
OK, so elog(ERROR, ...) and PGError(msg, ...) would be the same. Makes
sense. Should we consider hiding these in macros so they really still
call elog(ERROR, ...) for backward compatiblity?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-23 00:20:57 | Re: Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-22 23:38:50 | Re: elog() proposal |