Re: MySQL/InnoDB benchmarks

From: Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
To: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB benchmarks
Date: 2002-02-21 12:14:14
Message-ID: 20020221121416.B927DFC95@bugs.unl.edu.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jue 21 Feb 2002 02:38, you wrote:
> OK,
>
> Probably people are sick of MySQL stuff, but I think this is worth having a
> squiz at. As you may be aware, InnoDB is a table handler for MySQL that
> adds row-level locking, transactions and foreign keys to MySQL. Note that
> there is NO cascade support in this implementation of foreign keys.
>
> Now, the InnoDB guys have done some benchmarks:
>
> http://www.innodb.com/bench.html

I would have loved to see 100 processes simultaniously inserting 1000 records
to the databases (did you check the source of the benchmark?). PostgreSQL
would have kicked 'em all!

Saludos... :-)

--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | mmarques(at)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-21 12:36:13 [pgadmin-hackers] Feature request: md5sum footprint of schema objects
Previous Message Cyril Samovskiy 2002-02-21 09:39:22 Re: [HACKERS] foreign key is from different tables - what to do?