| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Logical vs. Physical attribute numbering |
| Date: | 2002-02-18 16:07:47 |
| Message-ID: | 200202210551.g1L5piM03851@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
We had a discussion a few days ago about removing attribute padding from
disk storage structures to fit more information on the disk.
Now, I question whether it is worth the added complexity to do this, but
the idea of having different logical and physical numbering of columns
seems like it may solve several problems:
o Columns can be reordered to minimize padding
o We can move variable length columns to the end, improving
performance
o We can fix inheritance problems in ADD COLUMN
o We can implement fast DROP COLUMN by renumbering the column
out of visibility
Comments?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-02-18 16:35:36 | Re: pg_ctl - tighten command parameter checking |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-18 15:23:50 | Re: [JDBC] Where is my patch ? |