Re: questions on ALTER TABLE ... OWNER

From: nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway)
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: questions on ALTER TABLE ... OWNER
Date: 2002-02-19 20:59:44
Message-ID: 20020219205944.GC24738@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:39:18AM +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 12:24 19/02/02 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Currently, ALTER TABLE ... OWNER will change the ownership of a table,
> >view, sequence or index -- despite the fact that its name hints that it
>
> Does it automatically alter the ownership of items 'owned' by the table
> (eg. PK indexes & serial sequences) when a table owner is altered?

No, AFAICT. Should it?

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-19 21:06:09 Re: Information about XLogWrite
Previous Message Philip Warner 2002-02-19 20:53:04 Re: pg_dump: use ALTER TABLE for PKs