Re: License question

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo(at)bayour(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: License question
Date: 2002-02-15 15:18:22
Message-ID: 20020215111817.S86207-100000@mail1.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


go to town :)

On 15 Feb 2002, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:

> I just got a question originating from our lawyers at work, concerning
> the usage of 'free software' in our product.
>
> The product (currently) consists of a modified Redhat 7.1 distribution,
> PostgreSQL 7.1.3 (in custom RPM packages) and some proprietary softwares.
>
> I read the license, and saw this paragraph:
>
> use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without
> a written agreement is hereby granted
>
> We're charging for the SYSTEM (ie, hardware and software combination)
> which contains and have PostgreSQL as a fundamental part of the whole
> system and function.
>
> We're not charging SPECIFICALLY for PostgreSQL, but for a complete, working
> setup... Is this in conformance with the PostgreSQL license...?
>
>
> Ortega counter-intelligence pits security Treasury Serbian smuggle
> Mossad [Hello to all my fans in domestic surveillance] Delta Force
> iodine South Africa Marxist Nazi tritium
> [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-15 15:24:10 Re: License question
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2002-02-15 15:18:12 Re: License question