From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? |
Date: | 2002-02-15 15:17:53 |
Message-ID: | 20020215111625.Q86207-100000@mail1.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Okay, if the ecpg is the only issue, does everyone feel comfortable with a
branch going in this evening? I'll do a v7.2.1 tar-ball up Sunday night
based on the branch, with an announce going out on Monday?
That way, those anxious to dive into v7.3 have the whole weekend :)
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> I musta missed something. What ecpg thing?
>
> > The sqlca warning
>
> Um, we can probably manage to double-patch a removal of two lines ;-)
>
> However, since there were no objections, what are you waiting for?
> Commit it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2002-02-15 15:18:12 | Re: License question |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-02-15 15:08:30 | Re: License question |