| From: | Jean-Paul ARGUDO <jean-paul(dot)argudo(at)idealx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ola Sundell <ola(at)miranda(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: feature request START WITH ... CONNECT BY |
| Date: | 2002-02-13 15:49:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20020213164923.A24296@singer.ird.idealx.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At last, here's the solution: NO NEED to group by :-/ ???
Now I ask for a WHY to hackers :)
select
sum(t01_caf) as SCAF,
sum(t01_itm_cnt) as SCAF
from
t01_20011231
where
strpos(t01_tree_sortkey,(select t01_tree_sortkey
from t01_20011231
where t01_upr_lvl_typ = :TypNiv
and t01_upr_lvl_nbr = :Niv))=1;
--
-- Stangely, I don't really understand why, there is no need of group by clause
-- there!
--
-- Here's the result:
-- scaf | scaf
---------------+---------
-- 40164802.36 | 1404296
--(1 row)
Thanks
--
Jean-Paul ARGUDO IDEALX S.A.S
Consultant bases de données 15-17, av. de Ségur
http://IDEALX.com/ F-75007 PARIS
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-13 15:57:27 | Re: alter table drop column status |
| Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2002-02-13 14:42:57 | Re: Connection Pooling |