From: | Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: again on index usage (7.1.3) |
Date: | 2002-02-12 16:36:55 |
Message-ID: | 200202121636.SAA01108@dcave.digsys.bg |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>Stephan Szabo said:
>
> Let's start with the standard set of things. Have you vacuum analyzed,
> what does explain show for the query, is there one value that is more
> common than all others?
>
My most recent 'standard' answer these days is "it worked well before VACUUM
ANALYZE" :-)
RADIUS=# explain
select * from attrib where user_name = 'Paacons'RADIUS-# ;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Seq Scan on attrib (cost=0.00..16978.46 rows=17922 width=48)
EXPLAIN
is what explain says by default.
RADIUS=# set enable_seqscan='off';
SET VARIABLE
RADIUS=# explain
select * from attrib where user_name = 'Paacons';
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Index Scan using uattr on attrib (cost=0.00..32861.00 rows=17922 width=48)
EXPLAIN
Daniel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-02-12 16:40:02 | Re: again on index usage (7.1.3) |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2002-02-12 16:28:06 | Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu |