Re: JDBC split and move ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, ryan(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC split and move ...
Date: 2002-02-11 05:21:51
Message-ID: 200202110521.g1B5Lpd28651@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> I meant to make a comment on this in my last mail note. It isn't true
> that jdbc is independent of the backend release cycle. In the last two
> releases that I have been involved in there have been changes in the
> backend that have required changes to jdbc. Thus a new jdbc release has
> been necessary for both 7.1 and 7.2. (generally this is due to changes
> in the core pg_* tables).

In 7.2, MD5 encryption also required jdbc changes.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kovács Péter 2002-02-11 08:49:56 Re: JDBC split and move ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-11 05:16:54 Re: JDBC split and move ...