From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Weiping He <laser(at)zhengmai(dot)com(dot)cn>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: what's the meaning of the word "Tioga" in source |
Date: | 2002-02-10 21:30:18 |
Message-ID: | 20020210172918.H1499-100000@mail1.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > Tom Lane writes:
> > >> Peter: it'd be a good idea to suppress gathering NLS messages out of
> > >> src/backend/commands/_deadcode/
> > >> src/backend/executor/_deadcode/
> > >> src/backend/optimizer/path/_deadcode/
> > >> src/backend/tioga/
> >
> > > Or we could just remove those files.
> >
> > That's a possibility too. I think it was Bruce's idea originally to
> > keep dead source files around, but I've never seen the point; isn't
> > that what CVS does for us?
>
> No, I would like all those files removed. I think Marc objected to
> their removal. To me, keeping stuff around that isn't every going to be
> used just adds confusion.
My only objection is that the Tioga stuff, from what I've seen of it,
looks like something we might want to revive when/if someone has time ...
but I could be tgotally mis-understanding what I've read about it too ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ulrich Wisser | 2002-02-10 21:54:59 | full text index |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-10 21:19:59 | Re: what's the meaning of the word "Tioga" in source |