| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Marden <amarden(at)usa(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Chad R(dot) Larson" <chad(at)eldocomp(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Recovery - transaction logs |
| Date: | 2002-02-07 16:58:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200202071658.g17Gwg509512@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Andy Marden wrote:
> I'm just coming at this from the point of view of someone who's
> implementing PostgreSQL for the first time, but has in-depth
> Oracle experience. This is the one area left where organisations
> are going to discount PostgreSQL because they can't afford to
> tell people that all data entered that day has to be re-entered
> (sorry) because of a database corruption. How slick it is
> doesn't matter initially, as long as it can reliably be done.
I totally agree. That's why it is under URGENT on the TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simone Tellini | 2002-02-07 17:37:18 | PG 7.2 tarball |
| Previous Message | Andy Marden | 2002-02-07 09:20:17 | Re: Recovery - transaction logs |