Re: Solaris Performance

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "P(dot)J(dot) \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance
Date: 2002-02-04 22:26:15
Message-ID: 200202042226.g14MQGp23647@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Actually, the first question to ask might be "are you using gcc"?
>
> It looks to me like s_lock.h/s_lock.c don't have a non-gcc
> implementation of tas() unless you define NEED_SPARC_TAS_ASM
> ... which src/include/port/solaris.h doesn't. Ugh.

Ouch. Can we throw a message in the server logs when we are using the
non-asm locking code?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sonia Sanchez Diaz 2002-02-04 22:46:37 Solaris Install
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-04 22:24:42 Re: