From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "P(dot)J(dot) \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Solaris Performance |
Date: | 2002-02-04 20:17:36 |
Message-ID: | 200202042017.g14KHaZ04363@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
P.J. "Josh" Rovero wrote:
> We've been running equivalent configurations and schema on
> HP-UX, Solaris, and x86 Linux, and benchmarking with
> pgbench and some application-specific data. All testing
> was with 7.2rc2, and all were built natively on each platform.
>
> Performance on Solaris (2.6 and 2.7) seems lackluster, even when
> postgres processes are not CPU, memory, or IO bound, and whether
> over local Unix or tcpip sockets.
>
> Are there any other Solaris-specific optimizations or configuration
> items that we should consider?
Yes, we have heard this report several times. We know process startup
is slower on Solaris that other operating systems. How much of your
testing is related to starting a new process? Other than that, we think
perhaps the sheer weight of Solaris is slowing us down, though we don't
have any hard answers to give you.
Sorry. I would rather have given a better answer. We are willing to
work with you to idenfity the parts that are slowest and see if we can
somehow work around them.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-04 20:43:10 | Re: Solaris Performance |
Previous Message | david blood | 2002-02-04 20:17:27 | Long column names and table names |