Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL

Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> At 11:26 AM 1/25/02 +0100, Holger Krug wrote:
> >so I won't repeat that stuff here), but I know that for scenarios like
> >yours connection pooling was invented. Connection pooling avoids the
> >creation of a new backend process for each single query. Did you ever
> >try your test with connection pooling ? Real databases *require*
> >connection pooling in such a case, MySQL or file systems
>
> If the database crashes are not due to resource limits, connection pooling
> does not seem to be the real solution.

The crash he reported this time looks like a backend dumping
core. I wonder how he killed the postmaster the last time
and if he by doing it with -9 corrupted the database?

The entire discussion is somehow pointless. Tell some Riksha-
puller to compare his Riksha with this brand new Ferrari, and
wait his comments after the test drive. He'll probably won't
get the damn thing moving, and if, it'd be a hell of a ride,
so he will tell you that his Riksha has a much better
handling and the Ferrari *crashed*.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com