From: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr |
Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation |
Date: | 2002-01-23 21:05:00 |
Message-ID: | 200201232105.g0NL50a15928@saturn.janwieck.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> Le Mercredi 23 Janvier 2002 15:16, Gavin Sherry a écrit :
> > > There is a strong need for :
> > > - CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW,
> > > - CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER.
> > I intend to do this.
> > Gavin
>
> Gavin, you suddenly became the community hero. Can you hear the screems of
> your fans? There is a crowd waiting for you. Where can I get a t-shirt with
> your name on it?
But please don't forget that simply overwriting an existing
pg_proc tuple will not cause a persistent database connection
to use the new version. PL/Tcl and PL/pgSQL for example cache
the precompiled procedure based on it's oid. So at least
think of a version count that get's bumped and checked in the
PL handlers.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Studenmund | 2002-01-23 21:15:33 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
Previous Message | Bill Studenmund | 2002-01-23 20:58:33 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |