Re: implemention of calls to stored procs.

From: Holger Krug <hkrug(at)rationalizer(dot)com>
To: Nic Ferrier <nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: implemention of calls to stored procs.
Date: 2002-01-23 11:30:53
Message-ID: 20020123123053.A16727@dev12.rationalizer.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:32:04AM +0000, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> As for your 1st objective... I don't think that would be easy, even
> with what I'm proposing there would have to be some sort of RMI or
> CORBA link to the remote app.
As far as I know, GCJ provides RMI libs, although not 100% tested. It
should be relatively easy because you must not handle transactions.

Concerning your implementation. Did I understand you right, that
you've implemented your own Connection class, in an instance of which
you encapsulate the current backend transaction ? If yes, so OK, it's
probably simpler than getting RMI to work, and really nice.

--
Holger Krug
hkrug(at)rationalizer(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nic Ferrier 2002-01-23 11:32:04 Re: implemention of calls to stored procs.
Previous Message Dmitry Alyabyev 2002-01-23 10:39:27 Permissions on non-owned database