Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, alavoor <alavoor(at)yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-21 15:02:18
Message-ID: 20020121110200.T91444-100000@earth.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> > I'd get rid of the 'foreseeable future' part myself ...
>
> The whole thing is too wordy.
>
> Many PostgreSQL developers past and present are uncomfortable with
> restrictions imposed by the GPL. The PostgreSQL project always has
> and will continue to remain under the BSD license alone.

This one is perfect ... Bruce? I really leaves no openings, no?

>
> It's an FAQ entry, not an exercise for a law student.
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Brent Verner wrote:
> >
> > > [2002-01-20 23:43] Bruce Momjian said:
> > >
> > > | At the great risk of causing chaos, let me chime in on this. First, in
> > >
> > > | However, we clearly don't have unanimous agreement on using GPL so I
> > > | would like to address this in an FAQ item to get it more concrete. What
> > > | do people think of this summary:
> > >
> > > | The GPL is similar to BSD, except that it has certain anti-closed source
> > > | (proprietary) restrictions.
> > >
> > > Calling the two licenses "similar" is only an invitation to engage
> > > in license war. I'd suggest something like the following (as long
> > > as it doesn't contain any factual errors).
> > >
> > > The PostgreSQL project has released its code under the BSD
> > > license since its inception. Occasionally, users request that
> > > the project be relicensed under the GPL. Many PostgreSQL
> > > developers feel the GPL contains certain restrictions that
> > > might limit the ability of commercial entities to contribute
> > > or continue contributing to the codebase, and question the
> > > need for such restrictions. In light of these concerns, we
> > > will continue with the BSD license for the foreseeable future.
> > >
> > > cheers.
> > > brent
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are
> > > really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
> > > to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing." -- Duane Allman
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> > >
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> >
>
>
> Vince.
> --
> ==========================================================================
> Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
> 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
> Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
> Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
> ==========================================================================
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-21 15:02:45 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-01-21 14:53:39 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-21 15:02:45 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-01-21 14:53:39 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL