From: | David Terrell <dbt(at)meat(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Date: | 2002-01-21 08:16:06 |
Message-ID: | 20020121001605.C24558@pianosa.catch22.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:04:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> This is the "viral" aspect of GPL that so many people have complained of.
>
> But wait a sec; the last thing we need here is yet another license
> discussion. Given that the objective of this FAQ addition is to prevent
> future license flamewars, I think the last thing we want it to do is
> give any suggestion that GPL-izing the code might actually be feasible.
> Why are you so eager to suggest that that might be possible?
Truth is useful, even if unpleasant.
Dave, happy with BSD.
--
David Terrell | "the only part about medicinal marijuana that
Prime Minister, Nebcorp | bothers me is that, when I started chemo, all of
dbt(at)meat(dot)net | my children and grandchildren told me they could
http://wwn.nebcorp.com/ | get some for me if I needed it." -mrw's grandfather
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karel Zak | 2002-01-21 08:32:34 | Re: SPI examples, manual |
Previous Message | Brent Verner | 2002-01-21 07:27:42 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-01-21 08:21:26 | Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |
Previous Message | David Terrell | 2002-01-21 08:12:47 | Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |