Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: David Terrell <dbt(at)meat(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-21 08:16:06
Message-ID: 20020121001605.C24558@pianosa.catch22.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:04:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> This is the "viral" aspect of GPL that so many people have complained of.
>
> But wait a sec; the last thing we need here is yet another license
> discussion. Given that the objective of this FAQ addition is to prevent
> future license flamewars, I think the last thing we want it to do is
> give any suggestion that GPL-izing the code might actually be feasible.
> Why are you so eager to suggest that that might be possible?

Truth is useful, even if unpleasant.

Dave, happy with BSD.

--
David Terrell | "the only part about medicinal marijuana that
Prime Minister, Nebcorp | bothers me is that, when I started chemo, all of
dbt(at)meat(dot)net | my children and grandchildren told me they could
http://wwn.nebcorp.com/ | get some for me if I needed it." -mrw's grandfather

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2002-01-21 08:32:34 Re: SPI examples, manual
Previous Message Brent Verner 2002-01-21 07:27:42 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-01-21 08:21:26 Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems)
Previous Message David Terrell 2002-01-21 08:12:47 Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems)