| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Murray Prior Hobbs <murray(at)efone(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |
| Date: | 2002-01-20 19:10:53 |
| Message-ID: | 200201201910.g0KJArH15682@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
> However I'm a bit scared to do that at this late stage of the release
> cycle, because perhaps some of these platforms don't support the full
> dlopen() API. Comments? Can anyone test whether RTLD_NOW works on
> any of the above-mentioned ports?
I can confirm that RTLD_NOW exists on BSD/OS. Can we do:
#ifdef RTLD_NOW
use RTLD_NOW
#else
whatever_is_there_now
#endif
in those ports at least for 7.2 so we can be sure we don't get failures.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-20 19:14:16 | Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-20 18:40:17 | RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-20 19:14:16 | Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-20 18:40:17 | RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |