Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o
Date: 2002-01-18 19:15:14
Message-ID: 200201181915.g0IJFFn03373@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> I think we should scrutinize this as carefully as we can, but apply it
> >> if at all possible.
>
> > Interesting solution. I defer to your opinion on this.
>
> Okay, I've applied it ;-). I studied the code carefully and also
> exercised as many combinations as I could think of. I think it's okay.
>
> You might want to run pg_indent on pg_backup_db.c however ...

Done.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-18 19:17:20 Confusing terminology
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-18 18:30:43 Re: 7.2b5 notes