Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist

From: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist
Date: 2002-01-15 22:13:58
Message-ID: 200201152213.g0FMDwF29111@saturn.janwieck.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > IIRC there was this cross DB shared buffer usage bug
> > somewhere in 7.1, that used blocks from another DB found by
> > accident in the cache.
>
> No, we found that one before 7.1 release, thank goodness.

You're right, it was just Tim who ran on BETA in production
for far too long (from out POV).

Well, got me, out of ideas too.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-15 22:19:31 Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures
Previous Message Bear Giles 2002-01-15 21:48:22 user types API wish list