From: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist |
Date: | 2002-01-15 21:24:31 |
Message-ID: | 200201152124.g0FLOVS28969@saturn.janwieck.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > When I first brought it down, I attempted this, but forgot -O. I've just
> > done this, however, it connected fine. Moreover, a select * from
> > pg_shadow; returned results! I vacuumed and brought the database back
> > online -- everything fine.
>
> > Extremely strange =\.
>
> Did I read you correctly to say that you're still on 7.1?
>
> This episode should convince you to update to 7.1.3, pronto.
> We don't make dot-releases for amusement value.
>
> (No, I can't cite any particular bug that might've led to this.)
IIRC there was this cross DB shared buffer usage bug
somewhere in 7.1, that used blocks from another DB found by
accident in the cache. So it all must have been a cache
problem and the postmaster restart fix^H^H^H made it
disappear and lurk again.
That bug can corrupt the system catalogs of all your
databases! Upgrade NOW!
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-15 21:39:37 | Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-01-15 20:50:04 | Re: again on index usage |