From: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem reloading regression database |
Date: | 2002-01-15 03:05:51 |
Message-ID: | 20020115030551.GB9816@rcfile.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[2002-01-14 21:52] Tom Lane said:
| Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
| > gotcha. No, I don't think anything inside that loop expects to
| > persist across iterations. The attribute_buf is static to the
| > file, and initialized in DoCopy.
|
| There is more to attribute_buf than meets the eye ;-)
I certainly don't doubt that, especially when it's my eye :-O
| > What I ended up doing is switching to per-tuple-context prior to
| > the input loop, then switching back to the (saved) query-context
| > after exiting the loop. I followed ResetTupleExprContext back, and
| > it doesn't seem to do anything that would require a switch per loop.
| > Are there any problems this might cause that I'm not seeing with
| > my test case?
|
| I really don't feel comfortable with running heap_insert or the
| subsequent operations in a per-tuple context. Have you tried any
| test cases that involve triggers or indexes?
no, I dropped the index for the 3mil COPY. I will run with some
triggers and indexes in the table.
cheers.
brent
--
"Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are
really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing." -- Duane Allman
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-01-15 03:49:51 | Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-15 02:52:23 | Re: Problem reloading regression database |