| From: | David Terrell <dbt(at)meat(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)range(dot)infoplease(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Maarten(dot)Boekhold(at)reuters(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pucher(at)atlas(dot)gis(dot)univie(dot)ac(dot)at |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres in bash-mode |
| Date: | 2002-01-13 11:43:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20020113034325.A28148@pianosa.catch22.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:41:06AM -0500, Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> Basically, you can trust identd if and only if you know that its your
> identd. But with identd, you can have a large number of scripts that
> continue to work after you change the password. (Note that you cannot
> use identd on the ub=nix socket).
>
> We are presently revamping our own security. If I had a good example of
> a system in a final state, I'd post it. I don't know, but maybe someone
> else can. Or maybe in a few weeks I'll post ours, if I can assure myself
> that disclosure won't reduce scurity (iff well designed, that should be
> the case, I think).
7.2 can run something like ident but better (guaranteed accurate) on
the unix socket on BSD and linux.
--
David Terrell | "The fact that you can't name the place
dbt(at)meat(dot)net | you're going to die doesn't mean you
http://wwn.nebcorp.com/ | shouldn't pay attention to your health." -whg3
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl DeBisschop | 2002-01-13 11:50:48 | Re: Postgres in bash-mode |
| Previous Message | Karl DeBisschop | 2002-01-13 11:41:06 | Re: Postgres in bash-mode |