From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql/src/backend/commands sequence.c |
Date: | 2002-01-11 20:47:33 |
Message-ID: | 200201112047.g0BKlXx14796@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Oh. Is that good? If we set the sequence xid as frozen, how do we
> > rollback a sequence creation?
>
> If we roll back a sequence creation, the whole table goes away.
> Conversely, even if we commit, no one can see the sequence until they
> can see the pg_class entry for it. Thus, it doesn't matter what's in
> the tuple.
OK, so you are using the pg_class visibility/destuction as an
optimitation to prevent vacuum of sequences --- sounds fine.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | momjian | 2002-01-11 20:48:48 | pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref pg_upgrade.sgml |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-11 20:44:18 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/commands sequence.c |